Analysis of Student Conception of Atomic Structure at the State SMA in Palu

Authors

  • Gavrila Gavrila Universitas Tadulako, Palu – Indonesia 94119
  • Suherman Suherman Universitas Tadulako, Palu – Indonesia 94119

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2020.v9.i2.pp111-117

Keywords:

Student conception, CRI (certainty of response index), high school, chemistry

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze student’s knowledge (percent) for who know concept (KC), misconception (MC), and do not know concept (DKC) on the subject of atomic structure at the state SMA in Palu. The sample of this study were students of SMAN Model Terpadu Madani, SMAN 3, and SMAN 9. Data were obtained through tracer tests of students’ conception in the form of multiple-choice consisted of 20 items accompanied by CRI (Certainty of Response Index) which was given to students to determine students' conceptions. Results of the study showed that the percentage of KC, MC, and DKC at SMAN Madani Model Palu were 65.6, 11.3, and 23.2% respectively, while at SMAN 3 Palu were 46.0, 15.1, and 38.9% respectively, and at SMAN 9 Palu were 5.9, 72.6, and 21.5% respectively.

Author Biographies

Gavrila Gavrila, Universitas Tadulako, Palu – Indonesia 94119

Prodi Pendidikan Kimia-FKIP

Suherman Suherman , Universitas Tadulako, Palu – Indonesia 94119

Prodi Pendidikan Kimia-FKIP

References

Afadil, & Diah, A. W. M. (2018). Effectiveness of learning materials with science-philosophy oriented to reduce misconception of students on chemistry, Proceeding of The First Indonesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leader International Conference on Education 2017. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.

Al-balushi, S. M., Ambusaidi, A. K., Al-shuaili, A. H., & Taylor, N. (2012). Omani twelfth grade students most common misconceptions in chemistry. Science Education International, 3(23), 221–240.

Çetingül, P. İ., & Geban, Ö. (2005). Understanding of acid-base concept by using conceptual change approach. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Journal of Education, 1(29), 69-74.

Coll, R., & Taylor, N. (2002). Mental models in chemistry: Senior chemistry students mental models of chemical bonding. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 2(3), 175–184.

Gabel, D. (2009). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(4), 548-554.

Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1-3

Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80(5), 509–534.

Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, E. L. (1999). Misconceptions and the certainty of response index (CRI). Physics Education, 5(34), 294–299.

Horton, C. Student preconception and misconceptions in chemistry (student alternative conceptions in chemistry). Diakses tanggal 12 Mei 2019, dari http://modeling.asu.edu/modeling/Chem-AltConceptions3-09.doc.

Ibrahim, M. (2012). Konsep miskonsepsi dan cara mengatasinya. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.

Kurniasih, M. D. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi mahasiswa dengan menggunakan certainty of response index (CRI) pada materi anatomi tubuh manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 5(1), 1-11

Mentari, L., Suardana, N., & Subagya, I. W. (2014). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa SMA pada pembelajaran kimia untuk materi larutan penyangga. E-Journal Kimia Visvitalis Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia, 2(1), 78-87.

Jannah, M., Ningsih, P., & Ratman. (2016). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Banawa Tengah pada pembelajaran larutan penyangga dengan CRI (certainty of response index). Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 5(2), 85–90.

Mursiti, S., Fardhyanti, D. S., Cahyono, E., & Sudarmin. (2006). Remediasi miskonsepsi orbital molekul dan hibridisasi melalui pembelajaran interaktif dengan animasi simulasi berbantuan komputer. Indonesian Journal of Chemical Science, 6(1), 104–110.

Noviani, M. W., & Istiyadji, M. (2017). Miskonsepsi ditinjau dari penguasaan pengetahuan prayarat untuk materi ikatan kimia kelas X. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 8(1), 63–77.

Nuha, W. U., & Sukarmin. (2013). Pengembangan software pendeteksi miskonsepsi kimia. Unesa Journal of Chemical Education, 2(3), 85–89.

Setiawan, D., Cahyono, E., & Kurniawan, C. (2017). Identifikasi dan analisis miskonsepsi pada materi ikatan kimia menggunakan instrumen tes diagnostik three-tier. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 197–204.

Suparno, P. (2005). Miskonsepsi dan perubahan konsep dalam pendidikan fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: A descriptive study. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-29

How to Cite

Gavrila, G., & Suherman , S. . (2020). Analysis of Student Conception of Atomic Structure at the State SMA in Palu. Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 9(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2020.v9.i2.pp111-117

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)