Descriptive Study of Understanding the Concept of Direct Current Electrical Circuits Through Real and Virtual Laboratory Learning

Authors

  • Tri Harry Indrah Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Tadulako
  • Darsikin Darsikin Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Tadulako
  • I Komang Werdhiana Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v17i1.817

Keywords:

Pemahaman Konsep, Laboratorium Riil, Laboratorium Virtual

Abstract

This study aims to describe the understanding of the concept of direct current electrical circuits through real and virtual laboratory learning. Subjects and respondents to this study as many as 6 students of the Physics Education Study Program class of 2016 who have programmed basic physics courses. The research instrument used is a three-tier multiple choice diagnostic test with DIRECT 1.1 which is a question of multiple choice with the reason in answering the question, each choice of answers accompanied by a choice of confidence level index in answering or CRI. The test instrument used as many as 24 question numbers. The test result data is then analyzed to determine the percentage of scientific concepts, understand alternative concepts, and do not understand concepts both before practicum and after practicum for each group. Based on the results of the analysis of research data, the concept of students before practicum either follow the learning through the real laboratory first then the virtual laboratory, as well as students who follow the learning through the virtual laboratory first then the real laboratory in the categorized very low, while after practicum in high categorization. Understanding the concept in students who have followed the learning using the real laboratory first then the virtual laboratory is relatively better compared to students who follow the learning using a virtual laboratory first then a real laboratory.

References

Bowen, A., & Reid, D., “Development of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Difficult Concepts in Thermodynamics,” Martin Award Paper, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 229-238, 2015.

Tüysüz, C., “The Effect of The Virtual Laboratory on Student Achiment and Attitude in Chemistry,” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37-53, 2010.

Zacharia, Z.C. and Olympiou G., “Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives to Improve Understanding in The Domain Of Light and Shadow,” Science Education, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 21-47, 2012.

Hawkin, I., Phelps, A., “Virtual laboratory vs. traditional laboratory: which is more effective for teaching electrochemistry?,” The Royal Society of Chemistry, vol. 14, pp. 516-523, 2013.

Finstein, & Jeanne, “Do Student in General High School Physics Class Learn as Much from Virtual Labs as from Hands-On Labs,” National Teacher Education Journal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 61-70, 2013.

Faour, M.A. & Ayoubi, Z., “The effect of using virtual laboratory on grade 10 students’ conceptual understanding and their attitudes towards physics,” Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), vol. 4 no. 1, pp. 54-68, 2018.

Omar, N., Zulkifili, R., “Development of a Virtual Laboratory for Radiation Heat Transfer,” European Journal of Scientific Reasearch, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 562-571, 2009.

Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J., ”Students' understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 72, pp. 98-115, 2004.

Hasan, S., & Bagayoko, D., “Misconceptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI),” Physics Education, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 294-299, 2014.

Yuyu R T., “Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika Menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI),” Mimbar Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 26, no. 3, 12-20, 2005.

Auliyani, A., et al., “Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Siswa pada Materi Sifat Koligatif Larutan dengan Menggunakan Three-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic test di Kelas XII IPA 2 SMAN 5 Banda Aceh,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 2 no. 1, 2016.

Riduan, “Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru-Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula,” Bandung: Alfabeta, 2004.

Zulkarnain, I., “Model Penemuan Terbimbing dengan Teknik Mind Mapping Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Volume 2, Nomor 3, 2014

Winn, W., Stahr, F., Sarason, C., Fruland, R., Oppenheimer, P., & Lee, Y-L., “Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 43, pp. 25–42, 2006.

Zacharia, Z., & Anderson, O. R., “The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students’ conceptual understanding of physics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 618–629, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-31

How to Cite

[1]
T. H. Indrah, D. Darsikin, and I. K. . Werdhiana, “Descriptive Study of Understanding the Concept of Direct Current Electrical Circuits Through Real and Virtual Laboratory Learning”, ME, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–39, May 2021.

Issue

Section

Articles