Describe Learning Outcomes of Students at MAN 2 Palu in Terms of the Tendency of Learning Styles in Chemistry

Authors

  • Annisaa Kusumaningrum Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Tadulako
  • Sri Mulyani Sabang Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v17i1.818

Keywords:

Learning Style, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This study aimed to describe learning outcomes of students at MAN 2 Palu in terms of the tendency of learning styles in chemistry. This type of study was descriptive research. Sampling was carried out using the proportional stratified random sampling technique consisted of 93 students. Data collection technique used instruments of learning style questionnaire and learning outcomes test as well as daily test scores of Acid and Base Solutions. The results showed that students of Class XI MIA at MAN 2 Palu had various learning styles. There were 49 students (53%) with a tendency to visual learning styles, 31 students (34%) with an auditorial learning style, and 13 students (13%) with a kinesthetic learning style. Students with visual learning style performed an excellent category of learning outcomes of 25,81% compared to students with an auditorial learning style of 16% and with a kinesthetic learning style of 8,6%.

References

Nurkholis, “Pendidikan dalam Memajukan Teknologi”. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2013, 1(1), 24-44.

N. Ghufron, & R. Risnawati, “Gaya Belajar Kajian Teoretik”. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2012.

Mubarik. “Profil pemecahan masalah siswa auditorial kelas X SLTA pada materi sistem persamaan linear dua variabel”. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 1(1), 2013, pp: 1-9.

Gustiani, L. “Hubungan antara gaya belajar (visual, auditory dan kinestetik) dengan kecerdasan intraporsional siswa kelas tinggi di SDN 03 Kota Bengkulu”. Skripsi. Bengkulu: Universitas Bengkulu, 2014.

Sundayana, R. “Kaitan antara gaya belajar, kemandirian belajar, dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa SMP dalam pelajaran matematika,” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP Garut, 5(2), 2016, pp. 75-84.

Prashign, B. “The power of learning styles: Memicu anak melejitkan prestasi dengan mengenali gaya belajarnya”. Bandung: Kaifa, 2007.

Sengodan, V., & Zanaton, H. I. “Students learning style and intrinsic motivation in learning mathematics,” Assian Social Science, 8(16), 2012, pp. 17-23.

DePorter, B & Hernacky, M. “Quantum learning”. Jakarta: Kaifa, 2005.

Putri, C. A. I., Putra, K. N. D., & Zulaikha, S. “Pengaruh metode pembelajaran SQ3R terhadap hasil belajar bahasa Indonesia kelas V,” Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan PGSD, 2(1), 2014, pp.1-11.

Arifin, M. “Strategi belajar mengajar kimia”. Bandung: JICA IMSTED UPI Bandung, 2000.

Yukina, Tuti, K., & Raudhatul, F. “Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran kimia kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Sungai Ambawang,” Ar-Razi Jurnal Ilmiah, 5(2), 2017, pp. 287-297.

Ristiyani, E., & Evi, S. B. “Analisis kesulitan belajar kimia siswa di SMAN X Kota Tanggerang Selatan,” Jurnal Penelitian dan pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 2016, pp. 18-29.

Gabel, D. “Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future,” Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 1999, pp. 548–554.

Malahayati, S. “Penerapan model pembelajaran inquiri berbasis praktikum untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan berfikir kritis siswa kelas X SMAN 2 Meureude pada materi rangkaian listrik,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 4(2), 2016, pp. 25–31.

Yunitasari, W., Susilowati, E., & Nurhayati, D. “Pembelajaran direct instruction disertai hierarki konsep untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi larutan penyangga kelas XI semester genap SMA Negeri 2 Sragen tahun ajaran 2012/2013,” Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia (JPK), 2(3), 2013, pp. 182–190.

Bostrom, L. “Effect of learning style responsive versus traditional approaches on grammar,” Institute of Learning Style Journal, 1(3), 2011, pp. 17-38.

Nawawi, H. “Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial”. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2012.

Riduwan. “Dasar-Dasar Statistic”. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.

Sugiyono. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan”. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.

Yusuf, A. M. “Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan”. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2014.

Arikunto, S. “Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan”. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.

Elytasari, M., Iceng, H., & A. Rachman, I. “Gaya belajar dan prestasi belajar kimia siswa SMA,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia, 2(1), 2015, pp. 44-50.

Bire, A. L., Uda, G., & Josua, B. “Pengaruh gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik terhadap prestasi belajar siswa,” Jurnal kependidikan, 44(2), 2014, pp. 168-174.

Hasanah, I., Sri, K., & Sutrisno, D. “Pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas XI jurusan akuntansi pada kompetensi dasar jurnal khusus di SMK Negeri 1 Jember semester genap tahun ajaran 2017/2018,” Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 12(2), 2018, pp. 277-282.

Khoeron, I. R., Nana, S., & Tatang, P. “Pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran produktif,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 1(2), 2014, pp. 291-297.

Wassahua, S. “Analisis gaya belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar matematika pada materi himpunan siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri Karang Jaya Kecamatan Namlea Kabupaten Buru,” Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 2016, pp. 84-104.

Mulyono, W. A., Purwandari, H., & Permana, R. H. “Pengaruh pelatihan gaya belajar terhadap peningkatan indeks prestasi mahasiswa,” Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman (The Soedirman Journal of Nursing), 2(3), 2007, pp. 134-140.

Widayanti, F. D. “Pentingnya mengetahui gaya belajar siswa dalam kegiatan pembelajaran di kelas,” ERUDIO, 2(1), 2013, pp. 7-21.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-31

How to Cite

Kusumaningrum, A., & Sabang, S. M. (2021). Describe Learning Outcomes of Students at MAN 2 Palu in Terms of the Tendency of Learning Styles in Chemistry. Media Eksakta, 17(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.22487/me.v17i1.818

Issue

Section

Articles