The Differences of Chemistry Learning Outcome Through the Implementation of Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Type of Cooperative Learning Model and Scramble Type in Teaching Atomic Structure

Authors

  • Alfinda D. Nande Universitas Tadulako, Palu - Indonesia 94119
  • Minarni R. Jura Universitas Tadulako, Palu - Indonesia 94119
  • Ratman Ratman Universitas Tadulako, Palu - Indonesia 94119

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2021.v10.i1.pp36-41

Keywords:

Think-talk-write, scramble, atomic structure, chemistry learning outcome

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the differences of chemistry learning outcome through the implementation of scramble type of cooperative learning model and think-talk-write (TTW) type in teaching atomic structure at class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Pamona Selatan. This research was a quasi-experiment with a non-randomized pretest-posttest control group design. It was conducted by arranging two groups in which class XI Natural Science 1 as experimental group 1 (n = 21) and class XI Natural Science 2 as experimental group 2 (n = 20). The data of the research were analyzed using a one-party t-test statistic with the prerequisite test, normality test, and homogeneity. The result of data analysis obtained, X̅1 value of chemistry learning on the students of experimental class 1 was 79.86 (SD = 7.15), whereas in the experimental class 2 students X̅2 value was 73.95 (SD = 8. 26). The result of hypothesis testing was obtained t > t1 - α was 2.55> 1.68 with significant level (α = 0.05) and degrees of freedom = 42. This showed that Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted so that it can be concluded that there were differences in chemistry learning outcome through the implementation of scramble type of cooperative learning model and think-talk-write (TTW) type in teaching atomic structure at class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Pamona Selatan.

Author Biographies

Alfinda D. Nande, Universitas Tadulako, Palu - Indonesia 94119

Chemistry Education/FKIP - Tadulako University

Minarni R. Jura, Universitas Tadulako, Palu - Indonesia 94119

Chemistry Education/FKIP - Tadulako University

Ratman Ratman, Universitas Tadulako, Palu - Indonesia 94119

Chemistry Education/FKIP - Tadulako University

References

Aisha, Z. & Nurhayati, S. (2013). Efektifitas classroom reflection assessement melalui cooperative learning dalam peningkatan hasil belajar. Chemistry in Education, 2(2), 178-184.

Amalia, P., & Surya, E. (2017). Perbedaan hasil belajar statistik antara model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dan TPS. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif Inovatif, 8(1), 8-14.

Ambari, N. L. P. D., Kusmariyatni, N., & Suarjana, M. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Think Talk Write Berbantuan Media Gambar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas IV Gugus 1 Kecamatan Tegallalang. Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 1(1), 1-10.

Elisa. (2014). An analysis of the second year students ability of SMAN 1 Suliki in rearranging scrambled sentences into a good hortatory exposition text. E- Jurnal Bunghatta, 3(5), 1-8.

Gambari, I. A. (2013). Effectiveness of video-based cooperative learning strategy on high, medium and low academic achievers. Journal of The African Education Research Network, 13(2), 77-85.

Glason, G. E., & Lalik, R. V. (1993). Reinterpreting the learning cycle from social contructivist perspective: a qualitative study of teachers beliefs and practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 187-207.

Harjasurjana, & Mulyati. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Scramble. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Isjoni. (2009). Pembelajaran kooperatif meningkatan kecerdasan komunikasi antar peserta didik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Iyer, R (2013) Relation between Cooperative Learning and Student Achievement. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 3(1), 21-25.

Kupczynski, L., Mundy, M., Goswami, J., & Meling, J. (2012). Researchers and education specialists endorse the view that student learning can be maximized, thus academic performance improved, by developing a sense of “we are all in the same boat together,” a basic tenet of cooperative learning (CL). International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 82-90.

Maheady, L. (2016). The effect of numbered heads together with and without an incentive package on the science test performance of a diverse of sixth graders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1(5), 24-38.

Murti, M. M. S., Redjeki, T., & Utomo, S. B. (2014). Studi komparasi metode pembelajaran kooperatif numbered heads together (NHT) think pair share (TPS) dengan memperhatikan kemampuan matematika terhadap prestasi belajar siswa pada materi pokok larutan penyangga di SMA Negeri 1 Jumapolo. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(4), 75-82.

Ozmen, H. (2004). Some student misconceptions in chemistry: A literature review of chemical bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 147-159.

Rustam, A., & Adli, M. (2016). Improving the results of math learning through scramble cooperative model with the approach of contextual teaching and learning model. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 7-14.

Sinaga, S. (2010). Konsep dan makna pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Solihatina, E., & Öztürkb, A. (2014). Increasing civics learning achievement by applying cooperative learning team game tournament method. David Publishing, 11(4), 949‐954.

Sudjana. (2013). Metode Statistik. Bandung: Tarsito.

To, K., & Wibisono, Y. (2009). Aplikasi anates v4. Bandung: Jurusan Psikologi Pendidikan dan Bimbingan.

Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131-140

Yanuarta, L., Waluyo, J., & Suratno. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe think, talk, write (TTW) dengan teknik talking stick dalam meningkatkan karakter dan hasil belajar IPA-Biologi (Siswa Kelas VII-E SMP Negeri 2 Kalisat Semester Genap Tahun Ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 69-78.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-12

How to Cite

Nande, A. D. ., Jura, M. R., & Ratman, R. (2021). The Differences of Chemistry Learning Outcome Through the Implementation of Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Type of Cooperative Learning Model and Scramble Type in Teaching Atomic Structure. Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 10(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2021.v10.i1.pp36-41

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>